Comments on: Short Pump-Based S&K Menswear Faces Possible Liquidation http://www.downtownshortpump.com/2009/05/12/short-pump-based-sk-menswear-faces-possible-liquidation/ The Official Guide To Richmond's Far West End Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:18:15 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Tony Anderson http://www.downtownshortpump.com/2009/05/12/short-pump-based-sk-menswear-faces-possible-liquidation/comment-page-1/#comment-2852 Tony Anderson Fri, 15 May 2009 03:14:01 +0000 http://www.downtownshortpump.com/?p=1788#comment-2852 It's sad to see this happen to the company that I worked for. Who would have guessed after almost 40 years of positive numbers? The Recession is a killer, but the company really started to fall in 2006. It was the first year where they didn't post positive YoY same store numbers. Good bye S&K. :(<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2852','Tony Anderson'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2852','Tony Anderson','It\'s sad to see this happen to the company that I worked for. Who would have guessed after almost 40 years of positive numbers?\r\n\r\nThe Recession is a killer, but the company really started to fall in 2006. It was the first year where they didn\'t post positive YoY same store numbers. \r\n\r\nGood bye S&K. :('); return false;">Quote</a></div> It’s sad to see this happen to the company that I worked for. Who would have guessed after almost 40 years of positive numbers?

The Recession is a killer, but the company really started to fall in 2006. It was the first year where they didn’t post positive YoY same store numbers.

Good bye S&K. :(

Reply | Quote
]]> By: S&K’s End Game « Daniel Durazo’s Blog http://www.downtownshortpump.com/2009/05/12/short-pump-based-sk-menswear-faces-possible-liquidation/comment-page-1/#comment-2832 S&K’s End Game « Daniel Durazo’s Blog Thu, 14 May 2009 14:02:32 +0000 http://www.downtownshortpump.com/?p=1788#comment-2832 [...] If you’re going to keep the company going, you don’t sell to Hilco, who is best known for liquidating the likes of The Sharper Image and The Bombay Company. Possibly related posts: [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2832','S&K’s End Game « Daniel Durazo’s Blog'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2832','S&K’s End Game « Daniel Durazo’s Blog','[...] If you’re going to keep the company going, you don’t sell to Hilco, who is best known for liquidating the likes of The Sharper Image and The Bombay Company. Possibly related posts: [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] If you’re going to keep the company going, you don’t sell to Hilco, who is best known for liquidating the likes of The Sharper Image and The Bombay Company. Possibly related posts: [...]
Reply | Quote
]]> By: Brandon Anderson http://www.downtownshortpump.com/2009/05/12/short-pump-based-sk-menswear-faces-possible-liquidation/comment-page-1/#comment-2791 Brandon Anderson Wed, 13 May 2009 00:40:46 +0000 http://www.downtownshortpump.com/?p=1788#comment-2791 Just a quick correction: Stuart Siegel stated in 2006 that S&K delisted themselves from the NASDAQ due to the newly-passed Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which would have required millions in regulation overhead had they stayed a publicly-traded company.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('2791','Brandon Anderson'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('2791','Brandon Anderson','Just a quick correction: Stuart Siegel stated in 2006 that S&K delisted themselves from the NASDAQ due to the newly-passed Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which would have required millions in regulation overhead had they stayed a publicly-traded company.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Just a quick correction: Stuart Siegel stated in 2006 that S&K delisted themselves from the NASDAQ due to the newly-passed Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which would have required millions in regulation overhead had they stayed a publicly-traded company.
Reply | Quote
]]>